The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
身の回りにあふれる線形代数
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IEICE Communications Society Magazine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1587/bplus.12.284 |
| Authors |
田中 聡久 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 16 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 104 | 95% |
| Scientists | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#592,872
of 26,540,415 outputs
Outputs from IEICE Communications Society Magazine
#3
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,192
of 371,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEICE Communications Society Magazine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,540,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them