↓ Skip to main content

日本人と中国人の親密なコミュニケーションは何が違うのか?

Overview of attention for article published in JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 159)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本人と中国人の親密なコミュニケーションは何が違うのか?
Published in
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS, September 2013
DOI 10.4092/jsre.21.9
Authors

木村 昌紀, 毛 新華

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,302,628
of 26,206,339 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS
#3
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,517
of 214,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,206,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them