↓ Skip to main content

PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON GINGER. I. PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIONS OF PUNGENT CONSTITUENTS, (6)-GINGEROL AND (6)-SHOGAOL

Overview of attention for article published in Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
8 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON GINGER. I. PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIONS OF PUNGENT CONSTITUENTS, (6)-GINGEROL AND (6)-SHOGAOL
Published in
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1984
DOI 10.1248/bpb1978.7.836
Pubmed ID
Authors

MAMORU SUEKAWA, ATSUSHI ISHIGE, KAZUNORI YUASA, KAZUHIKO SUDO, MASAKI ABURADA, EIKICHI HOSOYA

Abstract

General pharmacological studies were performed on (6)-gingerol and (6)-shogaol which are the pungent constituents of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Intravenous (i.v.) administration of (6)-gingerol (at 1.75-3.5 mg/kg) or (6)-shogaol (at 1.75-3.5 mg/kg) and oral administration of them (at 70-140 mg/kg) produced an inhibition of spontaneous motor activity, an antipyretic and analgesic effects, prolonged hexobarbital-induced sleeping time, and these effects of (6)-shogaol were mostly more intensive than that of (6)-gingerol. (6)-Shogaol showed an intense antitussive effect in comparison with dihydrocodeine phosphate. In the electro-encephalogram of cortex, the low amplitude fast wave pattern was observed for 5 min after i.v. administration of (6)-shogaol, and then changed to the drowsy pattern, which was restored after 60 min. In the gastro-intestinal system, (6)-shogaol intensively inhibited the traverse of charcoal meal through the intestine in contrast with (6)-gingerol after i.v. administration of 3.5 mg/kg, but (6)-shogaol facilitated such an intestinal function after oral administration of 35 mg/kg. Both (6)-shogaol and (6)-gingerol suppressed gastric contraction in situ, and the suppression by the former was more intensive than that by the latter. In the cardiovascular system, both (6)-shogaol and (6)-gingerol produced depressor response at lower doses on the blood pressure. At high doses, both drugs produced three phase pattern.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 32 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#187
of 3,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,264
of 35,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.