The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meat consumption in relation to mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ejcn.2012.6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Nagao, H Iso, K Yamagishi, C Date, A Tamakoshi |
| Abstract |
Although high or low (no) meat consumption was associated with elevated or reduced mortality from cardiovascular disease, respectively, few studies have investigated the association between moderate meat consumption and cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the associations between moderate meat consumption and cardiovascular disease mortality. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 22% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#736,628
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#274
of 4,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,260
of 261,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.