The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ニホンツキノワグマ(Ursus thibetanus japonicus)によるクマハギの発生原因の検討
|
---|---|
Published in |
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), July 2008
|
DOI | 10.11238/mammalianscience.42.35 |
Authors |
吉田 洋, 林 進, 堀内 みどり, 坪田 敏男, 村瀬 哲磨, 岡野 司, 佐藤 美穂, 山本 かおり |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
Other | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,852,539
of 26,154,612 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#65
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,208
of 98,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.