The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ビタミンC誘導体のイオントフォレーシスによる色素斑に対する臨床効果
|
---|---|
Published in |
Hifu no kagaku, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.11340/skinresearch.4.3_299 |
Authors |
船坂 陽子, 松中 浩, 榊 幸子, 山村 達郎, 山本 麻由, 錦織 千佳子 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,746,926
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Hifu no kagaku
#28
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,751
of 125,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hifu no kagaku
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.