↓ Skip to main content

ビタミンC誘導体のイオントフォレーシスによる色素斑に対する臨床効果

Overview of attention for article published in Hifu no kagaku, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 142)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ビタミンC誘導体のイオントフォレーシスによる色素斑に対する臨床効果
Published in
Hifu no kagaku, May 2011
DOI 10.11340/skinresearch.4.3_299
Authors

船坂 陽子, 松中 浩, 榊 幸子, 山村 達郎, 山本 麻由, 錦織 千佳子

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,746,926
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Hifu no kagaku
#28
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,751
of 125,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hifu no kagaku
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.