↓ Skip to main content

[A Patient with Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Who Developed Bálint Syndrome Improved by Combination Therapy Using Mefloquine and Mirtazapine].

Overview of attention for article published in Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[A Patient with Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy Who Developed Bálint Syndrome Improved by Combination Therapy Using Mefloquine and Mirtazapine].
Published in
Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, March 2019
DOI 10.11477/mf.1416201256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira Takekoshi, Nobuaki Yoshikura, Kenji Ozawa, Yoshikazu Ikoma, Junichi Kitagawa, Akari Takeshima, Mika Otsuki, Kazuo Nakamichi, Masayuki Saijo, Naoyuki Ohe, Kiyofumi Mochizuki, Akiyoshi Kakita, Takayoshi Shimohata

Abstract

We describe a 62-year-old man who developed subacute visual loss after cord blood stem cell transplantation for malignant lymphoma. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed bilateral hyperintense lesions in the occipital and parietal lobes. A diagnosis of progressive multifocal encephalopathy (PML) was established following brain biopsy and detection of JC virus (JCV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). He developed optic ataxia and visual inattention, and was then diagnosed as having Bálint syndrome. After he was treated with mefloquine and mirtazapine, his Bálint syndrome and, MRI findings improved and the copy number of JCV DNA in the CSF decreased. In summary, we demonstrate that patient with PML may develop Bálint syndrome and that combination therapy using mefloquine and mirtazapine may be an effective treatment. (Received August 23, 2018; Accepted November 29, 2018; Published March 1, 2019).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 45%
Researcher 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#365
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,047
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.