You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geographic variation in the intensity of warming and phenological mismatch between Arctic shorebirds and invertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Monographs, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecm.1383 |
| Authors |
Eunbi Kwon, Emily L. Weiser, Richard B. Lanctot, Stephen C. Brown, Heather R. Gates, Grant Gilchrist, Steve J. Kendall, David B. Lank, Joseph R. Liebezeit, Laura McKinnon, Erica Nol, David C. Payer, Jennie Rausch, Daniel J. Rinella, Sarah T. Saalfeld, Nathan R. Senner, Paul A. Smith, David Ward, Robert W. Wisseman, Brett K. Sandercock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 57% |
| Scientists | 18 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#852,514
of 26,213,600 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#56
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,588
of 361,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.