↓ Skip to main content

The actual condition of train collisions with large mammals in North Tohoku region

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Behaviour and Management, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The actual condition of train collisions with large mammals in North Tohoku region
Published in
Animal Behaviour and Management, February 2017
DOI 10.20652/abm.48.4_135
Authors

Chiaki NISHI, Rikio TAKASE, Takuo MURAKAMI, Hisayoshi KOFUJITA, Kazuei MATSUBARA, Yoshitaka DEDUCHI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,484,736
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Animal Behaviour and Management
#14
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,193
of 427,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Behaviour and Management
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.