↓ Skip to main content

北海道におけるアライグマ捕獲のためのEggTM Trapの有効性と混獲防止効果の検証

Overview of attention for article published in Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 354)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
北海道におけるアライグマ捕獲のためのEggTM Trapの有効性と混獲防止効果の検証
Published in
Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science), February 2007
DOI 10.11238/mammalianscience.46.169
Authors

阿部 豪, 青柳 正英, 的場 洋平, 佐鹿 万里子, 車田 利夫, 高野 恭子, 池田 透, 立澤 史郎

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,541,296
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#47
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,070
of 170,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Honyurui Kagaku (Mammalian Science)
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.