The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Formation of pseudomorphic nanocages from Cu2O nanocrystals through anion exchange reactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aad5520 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hsin-Lun Wu, Ryota Sato, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Masato Kimura, Mitsutaka Haruta, Hiroki Kurata, Toshiharu Teranishi |
| Abstract |
The crystal structure of ionic nanocrystals (NCs) is usually controlled through reaction temperature, according to their phase diagram. We show that when ionic NCs with different shapes, but identical crystal structures, were subjected to anion exchange reactions under ambient conditions, pseudomorphic products with different crystal systems were obtained. The shape-dependent anionic framework (surface anion sublattice and stacking pattern) of Cu2O NCs determined the crystal system of anion-exchanged products of CuxS nanocages. This method enabled us to convert a body-centered cubic lattice into either a face-centered cubic or a hexagonally close-packed lattice to form crystallographically unusual, multiply twinned structures. Subsequent cation exchange reactions produced CdS nanocages while preserving the multiply-twinned structures. A high-temperature stable phase such as wurtzite ZnS was also obtained with this method at ambient conditions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Nepal | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Researcher | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 53 | 40% |
| Materials Science | 23 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#521,785
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Science
#12,333
of 83,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,439
of 315,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#227
of 1,185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.