↓ Skip to main content

食育の観点からみた箸の持ち方と食事マナー

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cookery Science of Japan, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 233)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食育の観点からみた箸の持ち方と食事マナー
Published in
Journal of Cookery Science of Japan, October 2014
DOI 10.11402/cookeryscience.43.260
Authors

山内 知子, 小出 あつみ, 山本 淳子, 大羽 和子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,529,883
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#36
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,621
of 266,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cookery Science of Japan
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them