↓ Skip to main content

Variation in δ13C and δ15N diet–vibrissae trophic discrimination factors in a wild population of California sea otters

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in δ13C and δ15N diet–vibrissae trophic discrimination factors in a wild population of California sea otters
Published in
Ecological Applications, September 2010
DOI 10.1890/09-1502.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth D. Newsome, Gena B. Bentall, M. Tim Tinker, Olav T. Oftedal, Katherine Ralls, James A. Estes, Marilyn L. Fogel

Abstract

The ability to quantify dietary inputs using stable isotope data depends on accurate estimates of isotopic differences between a consumer (c) and its diet (d), commonly referred to as trophic discrimination factors (TDFs) and denoted by delta(c-d). At present, TDFs are available for only a few mammals and are usually derived in captive settings. The magnitude of TDFs and the degree to which they vary in wild populations is unknown. We determined delta13C and delta15N TDFs for vibrissae (i.e., whiskers), a tissue that is rapidly becoming an informative isotopic substrate for ecologists, of a wild population of sea otters for which individual diet has been quantified through extensive observational study. This is one of the very few studies that report TDFs for free-living wild animals feeding on natural diets. Trophic discrimination factors of 2.2 per thousand +/- 0.7 per thousand for delta13C and 3.5 per thousand +/- 0.6 per thousand for delta15N (mean +/- SD) were similar to those reported for captive carnivores, and variation in individual delta13C TDFs was negatively but significantly related to sea urchin consumption. This pattern may relate to the lipid-rich diet consumed by most sea otters in this population and suggests that it may not be appropriate to lipid-extract prey samples when using the isotopic composition of keratinaceous tissues to examine diet in consumers that frequently consume lipid-rich foods, such as many marine mammals and seabirds. We suggest that inherent variation in TDFs should be included in isotopically based estimates of trophic level, food chain length, and mixing models used to quantify dietary inputs in wild populations; this practice will further define the capabilities and limitations of isotopic approaches in ecological studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Brazil 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 183 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 24%
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 13 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 61%
Environmental Science 36 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 23 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,241,971
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#596
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,110
of 98,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.