The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impaired Air Conditioning within the Nasal Cavity in Flat-Faced Homo
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004807 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takeshi Nishimura, Futoshi Mori, Sho Hanida, Kiyoshi Kumahata, Shigeru Ishikawa, Kaouthar Samarat, Takako Miyabe-Nishiwaki, Misato Hayashi, Masaki Tomonaga, Juri Suzuki, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Teruo Matsuzawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#340,698
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#214
of 9,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,835
of 316,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#2
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.