↓ Skip to main content

Integration of vision and touch in the congenitally after operation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, January 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of vision and touch in the congenitally after operation
Published in
Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, January 1990
DOI 10.7210/jrsj.8.6_772
Authors

Shuko TORII

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,171,338
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,037
of 60,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them