The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Host‐associated genetic divergence and taxonomy in the Rhinusa pilosa Gyllenhal species complex: an integrative approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Entomology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/syen.12109 |
Authors |
IVO TOŠEVSKI, ROBERTO CALDARA, JELENA JOVIĆ, GERARDO HERNÁNDEZ‐VERA, COSIMO BAVIERA, ANDRE GASSMANN, BRENT C. EMERSON |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 54% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,121,741
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Entomology
#224
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,487
of 362,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Entomology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.