↓ Skip to main content

アスファルト舗装における出血痕と推定出血量に関する検討

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
305 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アスファルト舗装における出血痕と推定出血量に関する検討
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.11240/jsem.21.625
Authors

齋藤 祐介, 田久 浩志, 齊藤 英一, 田中 秀治, 植田 広樹, 曽根 悦子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 305 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#253,866
of 26,117,612 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,103
of 366,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,117,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them