↓ Skip to main content

中島敦とラフカディオ・ハーンの作品比較 : 『光と風と夢』と『佛領西印度の二年間』を中心に

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
中島敦とラフカディオ・ハーンの作品比較 : 『光と風と夢』と『佛領西印度の二年間』を中心に
Published in
Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education, December 2007
DOI 10.15027/22792
Authors

Se-Chun Hung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,732,227
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,706
of 169,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University Part II, Arts and science education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them