↓ Skip to main content

科学理論の意味論的概念による物理学的方法論の分析

Overview of attention for article published in Kagaku tetsugaku, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
科学理論の意味論的概念による物理学的方法論の分析
Published in
Kagaku tetsugaku, May 2009
DOI 10.4216/jpssj.37.2_119
Authors

森田 邦久

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#21,418,277
of 26,284,763 outputs
Outputs from Kagaku tetsugaku
#155
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,449
of 128,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kagaku tetsugaku
#62
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,284,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.