The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing spring direct mortality to avifauna from wind energy facilities in the Dakotas
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.1051 |
Authors |
Brianna J. Graff, Jonathan A. Jenks, Joshua D. Stafford, Kent C. Jensen, Troy W. Grovenburg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 31% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Energy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,027,868
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#829
of 2,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,938
of 303,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.