The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Premenstrual enhancement of snake detection in visual search in healthy women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep00307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Masataka, M. Shibasaki |
| Abstract |
It is well known that adult humans detect images of snakes as targets more quickly than images of flowers as targets whether the images are in color or gray-scale. When such visual searches were performed by a total of 60 adult premenopausal healthy women in the present study to examine whether their performance would fluctuate across the phases of the menstrual cycle, snake detection was found to become temporarily enhanced during the luteal phase as compared to early or late follicular phases. This is the first demonstration of the existence of within-individual variation of the activity of the fear module, as a predictable change in cognitive strength, which appears likely to be due to the hormonal changes that occur in the menstrual cycle of healthy women. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 35% |
| Psychology | 22 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#784,606
of 26,557,556 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#8,420
of 147,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,475
of 170,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#15
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.