↓ Skip to main content

雜草のビタミンCに就いて

Overview of attention for article published in KAJI TO EISEI, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
雜草のビタミンCに就いて
Published in
KAJI TO EISEI, March 2010
DOI 10.11468/seikatsueisei1925.18.6_46
Authors

都志 大二

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,780,268
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from KAJI TO EISEI
#4
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,269
of 105,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KAJI TO EISEI
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.