↓ Skip to main content

行動分析のプラグマティズム的特徴の理解について : 強化シークエンスと奇術師の選択

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 118)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
行動分析のプラグマティズム的特徴の理解について : 強化シークエンスと奇術師の選択
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
DOI 10.24456/jjba.6.2_91
Authors

瀬島 順一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,457,170
of 26,561,175 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#32
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,313
of 334,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#24
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.