↓ Skip to main content

Gate-Tunable Spin-Charge Conversion and the Role of Spin-Orbit Interaction in Graphene

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gate-Tunable Spin-Charge Conversion and the Role of Spin-Orbit Interaction in Graphene
Published in
Physical Review Letters, April 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.116.166102
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Dushenko, H. Ago, K. Kawahara, T. Tsuda, S. Kuwabata, T. Takenobu, T. Shinjo, Y. Ando, M. Shiraishi

Abstract

The small spin-orbit interaction of carbon atoms in graphene promises a long spin diffusion length and the potential to create a spin field-effect transistor. However, for this reason, graphene was largely overlooked as a possible spin-charge conversion material. We report electric gate tuning of the spin-charge conversion voltage signal in single-layer graphene. Using spin pumping from an yttrium iron garnet ferrimagnetic insulator and ionic liquid top gate, we determined that the inverse spin Hall effect is the dominant spin-charge conversion mechanism in single-layer graphene. From the gate dependence of the electromotive force we showed the dominance of the intrinsic over Rashba spin-orbit interaction, a long-standing question in graphene research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 28%
Researcher 33 22%
Student > Master 20 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 73 50%
Materials Science 22 15%
Engineering 15 10%
Chemistry 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,844,479
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#24,358
of 35,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,146
of 299,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#261
of 485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.