↓ Skip to main content

Oil-free hyaluronic acid matrix for serial femtosecond crystallography

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oil-free hyaluronic acid matrix for serial femtosecond crystallography
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep24484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michihiro Sugahara, Changyong Song, Mamoru Suzuki, Tetsuya Masuda, Shigeyuki Inoue, Takanori Nakane, Fumiaki Yumoto, Eriko Nango, Rie Tanaka, Kensuke Tono, Yasumasa Joti, Takashi Kameshima, Takaki Hatsui, Makina Yabashi, Osamu Nureki, Keiji Numata, So Iwata

Abstract

The grease matrix was originally introduced as a microcrystal-carrier for serial femtosecond crystallography and has been expanded to applications for various types of proteins, including membrane proteins. However, the grease-based matrix has limited application for oil-sensitive proteins. Here we introduce a grease-free, water-based hyaluronic acid matrix. Applications for proteinase K and lysozyme proteins were able to produce electron density maps at 2.3-Å resolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 21%
Chemistry 9 17%
Physics and Astronomy 6 11%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,129,336
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,719
of 123,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,212
of 299,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#675
of 3,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.