↓ Skip to main content

PP-626 ピアス孔より前部尿道全長にcondyloma acuminatumが伝播した一例(発表・討論,一般演題ポスター,第98回日本泌尿器科学総会)

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PP-626 ピアス孔より前部尿道全長にcondyloma acuminatumが伝播した一例(発表・討論,一般演題ポスター,第98回日本泌尿器科学総会)
Published in
Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 2010
DOI 10.5980/jpnjurol.101.525_2
Authors

高橋 さゆり, 森 ちか, 佐藤 悠佑, 山田 大介, 平野 美和, 河村 毅, 上條 利幸, 本間 之夫

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#21,400,044
of 26,264,723 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#173
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,307
of 177,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,264,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.