↓ Skip to main content

英国の病院のArts in Healthの概念と活動組織に関する研究

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
英国の病院のArts in Healthの概念と活動組織に関する研究
Published in
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2019
DOI 10.3130/aija.84.87
Authors

高野 真悟, 阿部 順子, 鈴木 賢一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#380
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,974
of 450,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.