You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Martian dust devil statistics from high‐resolution large‐eddy simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2016gl068896 |
| Authors |
Seiya Nishizawa, Masatsugu Odaka, Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi, Ko‐ichiro Sugiyama, Kensuke Nakajima, Masaki Ishiwatari, Shin‐ichi Takehiro, Hisashi Yashiro, Yousuke Sato, Hirofumi Tomita, Yoshi‐Yuki Hayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 57% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 29% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,517,216
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#6,091
of 20,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,191
of 318,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#106
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.