The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate teleconnections synchronize Picea glauca masting and fire disturbance: Evidence for a fire‐related form of environmental prediction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ecology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2745.13308 |
| Authors |
Davide Ascoli, Andrew Hacket‐Pain, Jalene M. LaMontagne, Adrián Cardil, Marco Conedera, Janet Maringer, Renzo Motta, Ian S. Pearse, Giorgio Vacchiano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ecology
#1,220
of 3,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,305
of 384,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ecology
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.