↓ Skip to main content

メンタルモデルの自発的形成過程と対象との同型性

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
メンタルモデルの自発的形成過程と対象との同型性
Published in
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, October 2008
DOI 10.11225/jcss.2.1_86
Authors

古田 貴久, 駒崎 久明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#206
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,295
of 102,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
#27
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.