The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of the Availability Concept by Using Fuzzy Theory with AHP Correction, a Case Study: Bulldozers in the Open-Pit Lignite Mine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energies, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/en12214044 |
| Authors |
Stevan Djenadic, Dragan Ignjatovic, Milos Tanasijevic, Ugljesa Bugaric, Ivan Jankovic, Tomislav Subaranovic |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,585,448
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Energies
#3,748
of 9,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,905
of 360,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energies
#119
of 349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.