The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical efficacy of a 1% Matricaria chamomile L. mouthwash and 0.12% chlorhexidine for gingivitis control in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Oral Science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2334/josnusd.16-0280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula Goes, Caio S. Dutra, Mário R. P. Lisboa, Delane V. Gondim, Renata Leitão, Gerly A. C. Brito, Rodrigo O. Rego |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,583,218
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Science
#127
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,653
of 405,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Science
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.