↓ Skip to main content

Community Reinforcement and Family Trainingの効果 : メタ分析を用いた検討(<特集>CRAFT)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community Reinforcement and Family Trainingの効果 : メタ分析を用いた検討(<特集>CRAFT)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
DOI 10.24468/jjbt.41.3_179
Authors

野中 俊介, 境 泉洋

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,861,983
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#177
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,636
of 368,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#109
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.