The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
徳島県志和岐川に遡上するヤマトヌマエビの生態
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Researches on Crustasea, January 1992
|
| DOI | 10.18353/rcustacea.21.0_1 |
| Authors |
Tatsuo HAMANO, Ken-Ichi HAYASHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 83% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Researches on Crustasea
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,249
of 64,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Researches on Crustasea
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them