The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geomorphic control of landscape carbon accumulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1029/2005jg000077 |
Authors |
Nan A. Rosenbloom, Jennifer W. Harden, Jason C. Neff, David S. Schimel |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 27% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Professor | 8 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 18 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,197
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,197
of 172,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#49
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.