The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Petit-spot volcanism: A new type of volcanic zone discovered near a trench
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geochemical Journal, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.2343/geochemj.1.0111 |
Authors |
NAOTO HIRANO |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
Researcher | 8 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,404,954
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Geochemical Journal
#3
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,300
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them