The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ホエイペプチド配合免疫調整流動食経口摂取が歯周炎患者における歯肉溝滲出液の炎症性サイトカインに与える影響
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.11471/shikahozon.58.109 |
| Authors |
久保田 健彦, 冨田 尊志, 濃野 要, 阿部 大輔, 清水 太郎, 杉田 典子, 金子 昇, 根津 新, 川島 昭浩, 坪井 洋, 佐々木 一, 吉江 弘正 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 30% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,766,832
of 26,463,849 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
#2
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,600
of 279,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,463,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them