The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ALARA 原則の実用的な実装における合理性に関するフランス放射線防護学会(SFRP)と国際放射線防護学会(IRPA)のワークショップの要約
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Health Physics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.5453/jhps.54.188 |
| Authors |
Jean-François LECOMTE, Amber BANNON, Yann BILLARAND, Peter BRYANT, Marie-Claire CANTONE, Roger COATES, John CROFT, Stéphane JEAN-FRANÇOIS, Bernard Le GUEN, Caroline SCHIEBER, Thierry SCHNEIDER |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Health Physics
#137
of 164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,498
of 478,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Health Physics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.