The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dermal denticle assemblages in coral reef sediments correlate with conventional shark surveys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.13346 |
| Authors |
Erin M. Dillon, Kevin D. Lafferty, Douglas J. McCauley, Darcy Bradley, Richard D. Norris, Jennifer E. Caselle, Graziella V. DiRenzo, Jonathan P. A. Gardner, Aaron O'Dea |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Panama | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 57 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 36 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#699,133
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#193
of 2,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,458
of 478,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.