The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biospinning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Society of Fiber Science & Technology, Japan / Sen'i Gakkaishi, January 1997
|
DOI | 10.2115/fiber.53.7_p202 |
Authors |
JUN MAGOSHI, YOSHIKO MAGOSHI, TAMAKO HATA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,984,852
of 26,490,075 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Society of Fiber Science & Technology, Japan / Sen'i Gakkaishi
#28
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,487
of 94,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Society of Fiber Science & Technology, Japan / Sen'i Gakkaishi
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,490,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.