The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 530 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biaa002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Tickner, Jeffrey J Opperman, Robin Abell, Mike Acreman, Angela H Arthington, Stuart E Bunn, Steven J Cooke, James Dalton, Will Darwall, Gavin Edwards, Ian Harrison, Kathy Hughes, Tim Jones, David Leclère, Abigail J Lynch, Philip Leonard, Michael E McClain, Dean Muruven, Julian D Olden, Steve J Ormerod, James Robinson, Rebecca E Tharme, Michele Thieme, Klement Tockner, Mark Wright, Lucy Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 44 | 8% |
| Canada | 34 | 6% |
| United States | 33 | 6% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 1% |
| Austria | 7 | 1% |
| Ireland | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Colombia | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 11% |
| Unknown | 321 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 376 | 71% |
| Scientists | 126 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 25 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 899 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 899 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 162 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 117 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 98 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 3% |
| Other | 120 | 13% |
| Unknown | 299 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 221 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 21% |
| Engineering | 23 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 8% |
| Unknown | 355 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 745. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#28,576
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#14
of 2,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#882
of 387,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.