You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Added Value of Large-eddy and Storm-resolving Models for Simulating Clouds and Precipitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2151/jmsj.2020-021 |
| Authors |
Bjorn STEVENS, Claudia ACQUISTAPACE, Akio HANSEN, Rieke HEINZE, Carolin KLINGER, Daniel KLOCKE, Harald RYBKA, Wiebke SCHUBOTZ, Julia WINDMILLER, Panagiotis ADAMIDIS, Ioanna ARKA, Vasileios BARLAKAS, Joachim BIERCAMP, Matthias BRUECK, Sebastian BRUNE, Stefan A. BUEHLER, Ulrike BURKHARDT, Guido CIONI, Montserrat COSTA-SURÓS, Susanne CREWELL, Traute CRÜGER, Hartwig DENEKE, Petra FRIEDERICHS, Cintia Carbajal HENKEN, CATHY Hohenegger, Marek JACOB, Fabian JAKUB, Norbert KALTHOFF, Martin KÖHLER, Thirza W. van LAAR, Puxi LI, Ulrich LÖHNERT, Andreas MACKE, Nils MADENACH, Bernhard MAYER, Christine NAM, Ann Kristin NAUMANN, Karsten PETERS, Stefan POLL, Johannes QUAAS, Niklas RÖBER, Nicolas ROCHETIN, Leonhard SCHECK, Vera SCHEMANN, Sabrina SCHNITT, Axel SEIFERT, Fabian SENF, Metodija SHAPKALIJEVSKI, Clemens SIMMER, Shweta SINGH, Odran SOURDEVAL, Dela SPICKERMANN, Johan STRANDGREN, Octave TESSIOT, Nikki VERCAUTEREN, Jessica VIAL, Aiko VOIGT, Günter ZÄNGL |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,559,646
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#51
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,752
of 418,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.