The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acoustic space occupancy: Combining ecoacoustics and lidar to model biodiversity variation and detection bias across heterogeneous landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Indicators, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106172 |
| Authors |
Danielle I. Rappaport, J. Andrew Royle, Douglas C. Morton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 26% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,663,839
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#1,499
of 3,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,316
of 434,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#37
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.