↓ Skip to main content

Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
999 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1089 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1200311109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget R. Scanlon, Claudia C. Faunt, Laurent Longuevergne, Robert C. Reedy, William M. Alley, Virginia L. McGuire, Peter B. McMahon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,089 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1069 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 233 21%
Student > Master 170 16%
Researcher 145 13%
Student > Bachelor 66 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 177 16%
Unknown 243 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 206 19%
Environmental Science 200 18%
Engineering 130 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25 2%
Other 92 8%
Unknown 318 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#223,990
of 26,458,381 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,174
of 105,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#945
of 180,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#30
of 959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,458,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.