You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
急性期脳卒中患者における上肢機能評価を用いた麻痺した利き手で箸操作が自立できる予測因子の検討
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Occupational Therapy Research, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.32178/jotr.38.3_277 |
Authors |
近藤 健, 関根 圭介, 武田 智徳, 野口 直人, 李 範爽 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 5 | 42% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,474,447
of 26,150,897 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#16
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,476
of 370,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Occupational Therapy Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them