The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bark Beetle‐Affected Forests Provide Elk Only a Marginal Refuge from Hunters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.21814 |
Authors |
Bryan G. Lamont, Matthew J. Kauffman, Jerod A. Merkle, Tony W. Mong, Matthew M. Hayes, Kevin L. Monteith |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 27% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 45% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 14% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,858,779
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#672
of 2,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,384
of 456,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.