The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
顎脚類(甲殻類)の分類と系統に関する研究の最近の動向
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.19004/taxa.48.0_49 |
| Authors |
大塚 攻, 田中 隼人 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 14% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 94% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,280,865
of 26,314,972 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#4
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,509
of 393,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.