The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Economic valuation of health benefits from using geologic data to communicate radon risk potential
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12940-020-00589-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Scott J. Chiavacci, Carl D. Shapiro, Emily J. Pindilli, Clyde F. Casey, Mary Kay Rayens, Amanda T. Wiggins, William M. Andrews, Ellen J. Hahn |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,497,058
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#462
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,906
of 367,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.