↓ Skip to main content

東南アジアの樹木多様性に関する広域的・網羅的アセスメント

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
東南アジアの樹木多様性に関する広域的・網羅的アセスメント
Published in
Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, February 2019
DOI 10.32135/fgtb.8.1_45
Authors

矢原 徹一, 遠山 弘法, 田金 秀一郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
#31
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,662
of 452,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.