The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of astaxanthin-rich extract derived from Paracoccus carotinifaciens on the status of stress and sleep in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.3164/jcbn.19-113 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masahiro Hayashi, Moe Kawamura, Yuki Kawashima, Takeshi Uemura, Takashi Maoka |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,342,420
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#145
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,568
of 478,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.